XLink as it is right now would be very bad for XHTML.  I seriously doubt 
page authors will want to have to declare a simple link EVERY SINGLE 
TIME they want to have a link.

Oskar Welzl wrote:

>Shall we try one more "XLink in XHTML 2.0"?
>Count my vote. - But I'm afraid I'm too late. Again. :-(
>  
>
-- 
http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/  - Get Firefox!
http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/  - Reclaim Your Inbox!

Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html