Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Re: tag for notion and compound indication

From: Devin Bayer <devin.bayer@rochester.edu>
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 08:48:50 -0700
To: Simon Siemens <Simon.Siemens@web.de>
Cc: XHTML-Liste <www-html@w3.org>
Message-id: <9433E33C-C284-43E0-950B-30A3C492AFDE@rochester.edu>


On Aug 5, 2005, at 1:15, Simon Siemens wrote:

> However what has not been addressed by HTML up to
> now are compound words. I suppose, this is because English does not  
> have
> them to a relevant extend. But German e.g. has many compound words  
> (like
> "Bundesregierung": "Bund" + "Regierung"). Thus an ability to indicate
> such compositions could really enhance search engine results from a
> German point of view.

Why not use the the word joiner (2060) character? Excerpted from  
Unicode:

Word Joiner behaves like &nbsp; in that it indicates the absence of  
word boundaries; however, the word joiner has no width. For example,  
the word joiner can be inserted after the fourth character in the  
text ?base+delta? to indicate that there should be no line break  
between the ?e? and the ?+?. The word joiner should be ignored in  
contexts other than word or line breaking.

- Devin Bayer
Received on Friday, 5 August 2005 15:48:57 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.