![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: tag for notion and compound indication
From: Devin Bayer <devin.bayer@rochester.edu>
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 08:48:50 -0700 To: Simon Siemens <Simon.Siemens@web.de> Cc: XHTML-Liste <www-html@w3.org> Message-id: <9433E33C-C284-43E0-950B-30A3C492AFDE@rochester.edu> On Aug 5, 2005, at 1:15, Simon Siemens wrote: > However what has not been addressed by HTML up to > now are compound words. I suppose, this is because English does not > have > them to a relevant extend. But German e.g. has many compound words > (like > "Bundesregierung": "Bund" + "Regierung"). Thus an ability to indicate > such compositions could really enhance search engine results from a > German point of view. Why not use the the word joiner (2060) character? Excerpted from Unicode: Word Joiner behaves like in that it indicates the absence of word boundaries; however, the word joiner has no width. For example, the word joiner can be inserted after the fourth character in the text ?base+delta? to indicate that there should be no line break between the ?e? and the ?+?. The word joiner should be ignored in contexts other than word or line breaking. - Devin BayerReceived on Friday, 5 August 2005 15:48:57 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||