![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: Backwards Compatibility - XForms
From: Dustin <gohankid77@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 23:56:19 -0600 Message-ID: <72ab364a05040121561f1cb05b@mail.gmail.com> To: W3C Mailing Archives <www-html@w3.org> You can actually. If you embed it in an XHTML document and reference the namespace, you can use XForms in your XHTML document. However, there _would_ need to be a way for a UA to determine if XForms or HTML Forms will be used. This would be an XHTML issue though, not an XForms issue. Scripting could be used to achieve the desired effect, but XHTML2 is trying to focus more on client-side validation without scripting. Perhaps a 'noforms' element would be a welcome addition? (bad name for an element, I know) ^_^ On Mar 30, 2005 8:10 PM, Kelly Miller <lightsolphoenix@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I was wondering, in terms of backwards compatibility, why it wouldn't be > possible to have a sort of "no XForms" tag that would work akin to the > noscript and noframes tag? That way, if the browser doesn't support > XForms, a designer can use a standard HTML form instead, maintaining > backwards compatibility while not losing the benefits of XForms. >Received on Saturday, 2 April 2005 05:56:29 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||