Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Re: [xframes] Remarks

From: Steven Pemberton <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 16:25:08 +0200
To: "Jens Meiert" <jens.meiert@erde3.com>, "Steven Pemberton" <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>
Cc: www-html-editor@w3.org, www-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <opsfeib6jesmjzpq@viao-1>

On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 15:27:05 +0200 (MEST), Jens Meiert  
<jens.meiert@erde3.com> wrote:

>> [...] and there is no way to
>> tell the server "I only accept HTML without Frames".
>
> Well, but content negotiation also means "I prefer the German version of
> this resource", CMIIW. And to be honest, I don't know if this really does
> not work with framesets.

The remark in the spec is only about a user agent being able to tell the  
server that it can't process frames.

>> There is much discussion about the appropriateness of the style
>> attribute, since it undermines one of the basic premises of
>> stylesheets: the separation of content and presentation.
>
> I know this "discussion", and if you check my site you'll notice that I  
> even
> don't use "class" and "id" attributes to achieve a /full/ separation.

There's nothing in "class" and "id" that prevents a full separation of  
presentation and content.

Steven Pemberton
Received on Tuesday, 5 October 2004 14:25:43 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.