![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: [xframes] Remarks
From: Jens Meiert <jens.meiert@erde3.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 15:27:05 +0200 (MEST) To: "Steven Pemberton" <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl> Cc: www-html-editor@w3.org,www-html@w3.org Message-ID: <17317.1096982825@www4.gmx.net> > [...] and there is no way to > tell the server "I only accept HTML without Frames". Well, but content negotiation also means "I prefer the German version of this resource", CMIIW. And to be honest, I don't know if this really does not work with framesets. > There is much discussion about the appropriateness of the style > attribute, since it undermines one of the basic premises of > stylesheets: the separation of content and presentation. I know this "discussion", and if you check my site you'll notice that I even don't use "class" and "id" attributes to achieve a /full/ separation. Nonetheless, I can only answer what I answered Dave (Woolley) yet: The "style" situation changes completely if you take at least the proposed "complete style sheet profile" [1] into account, and this is at least one issue what some "no style" advocates seem to miss. Regards, Jens. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/css-style-attr#complete -- Jens Meiert Interface Architect (IxD) http://meiert.com/Received on Tuesday, 5 October 2004 13:27:38 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||