Dear HTML WG,


please allow me two remarks concerning the XFrames Working Draft [1]:

* What do you mean with "Since you can't content negotiatiate [...]" [2] --
ain't it true that you indeed can use content negotiation in framesets, e.g.
by using "<frame id="foo" source="bar" />"? Or is this issue misleadingly
formulated?

* Ain't the "style" attribute missing in the list of Common Attributes [3]?
-- I guess it's quite likely that this attribute will be the "regular" way
to define frame measures (compared to the proposed definition via "class"
attributes).

By the way, I also found two typos:

* Introduction: "several usability problem [...]"
* Links and Targets [4]: "in some way targetted [...]"


All the best,
 Jens.


[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xframes/ 
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xframes/#s_intro 
[3] http://www.w3.org/TR/xframes/#s_common-attributes 
[4] http://www.w3.org/TR/xframes/#s_links 


-- 
Jens Meiert
Interface Architect (IxD)

http://meiert.com/