![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: Concerns about the "l" element name <l>
From: Trejkaz Xaoza <trejkaz@xaoza.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 18:35:17 +1100 To: "HTML List" <www-html@w3.org> Message-Id: <200411021835.19678.trejkaz@xaoza.net> On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 18:23: > <a> should be <anchor>, imho. No need to cut the last five letters, I > think. Even that doesn't make sense anymore. "Anchor" to me says "something you link _to_." Which is not what <a/> really does anymore, since the W3C recommends everyone to use the id attribute for anchor points in a document. Also, does <a/> really give any more meaning than <span/> these days? Now that they both have the same attributes in XHTML 2.0, I'm surprised that <a/> is even still there. :-D TX -- Email: Trejkaz Xaoza <trejkaz@xaoza.net> Web site: http://xaoza.net/ Jabber ID: trejkaz@jabber.xaoza.net GPG Fingerprint: 9EEB 97D7 8F7B 7977 F39F A62C B8C7 BC8B 037E EA73Received on Tuesday, 2 November 2004 07:35:01 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||