Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Re: Concerns about the "l" element name <l>

From: Asbjørn Ulsberg <asbjorn@tigerstaden.no>
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 07:27:08 +0100
To: "Antonio Gallardo" <antonio@apache.org>
Cc: "HTML List" <www-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <opsgtqvibkuvpchu@quark>

On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 10:55:16 +0000, Antonio Gallardo <antonio@apache.org>  
wrote:

> Long time ago in the University, the teachers told us that we need to
> avoid naming variables with names like: l, because in some fonts it is
> very close to: I or even 1.
>
> See a sample: <l>, <I>, <1> or even <|>.
>
> I think we need to define a better name in order to avoid people to waste
> time debugging this kind of errors.

I think this is a good point. I've never quite understood why HTML always  
wanted to shorten stuff so incredibly; why can't <l> be <line>? Those six  
extra letters (including the end tag) is not the end of the world when it  
comes to markup size, especially if the markup is gzip'ed.

This is a good remark that imho should be taken into consideration. In  
Courier New, the font I think is used by most development tools (at least  
on Windows) the difference between l and 1 is only two pixels. That's not  
much. For beginners, that difference might not be visible at all.

-- 
Asbjørn Ulsberg         -=|=-        asbjornu@hotmail.com
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
Received on Tuesday, 2 November 2004 06:25:38 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.