On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 11:38:16 +1100, <trejkaz@trypticon.org> wrote:

> Yep, so it looks like it's easier to just try to parse the document as  
> SGML.

Isn't it a problem that valid XHTML is invalid HTML? Won't that make it  
invalid SGML as well?

<url: http://annevankesteren.nl/archives/2004/06/invalid-html >

-- 
Asbjørn Ulsberg         -=|=-        asbjornu@hotmail.com
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»