Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Re: Issues with <dl> [continued from Re: Concerns about the "l" element name <l>]

From: <trejkaz@trypticon.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 16:30:54 +1100
To: www-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <20041105053054.GA2124@dev.xaoza.net>
At Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 02:10:22AM +0200, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
> That is, only if you think words have meanings and once you have _defined_
> something you cannot proceed to babbling about something completely
> different "use" for it. It's quite comparable to saying that <blockquote>
> means 'block quotation' and then describe that it is used to indent text
> (which is in effect what the specification says, though with _some_
> disapproval - it refuses to say such usage is _wrong_, it just declares it
> "deprecated").

deprecate
   1. To express disapproval of; deplore.
   2. To belittle; depreciate.

Isn't expressing disapproval of something the same as saying it's wrong?
Or is that another grey area?

Deprecation to me means "Don't do it!  But if it's there already, that's fine."

TX

-- 
             Email: Trejkaz Xaoza <trejkaz@xaoza.net>
          Web site: http://xaoza.net/trejkaz/ 
         Jabber ID: trejkaz@jabber.xaoza.net
   GPG Fingerprint: 9EEB 97D7 8F7B 7977 F39F  A62C B8C7 BC8B 037E EA73

Received on Friday, 5 November 2004 04:51:36 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.