![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: Concerns about the "l" element name <l>
From: Johannes Koch <koch@w3development.de>
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 12:56:04 +0100 Message-ID: <418A18D4.2080807@w3development.de> To: www-html@w3.org Jukka K. Korpela wrote: > If you want something that really means a list of definitions, you should > at least name it differently, to avoid association with <dl> and to make > the markup less cryptic. On the other hand, you might also consider how > useful such a specialized construct is. That reminds me of a problem I had, when I wanted to markup something because it was different from the surrounding stuff. But there was no appropriate element in (X)HTML. Then I thought that there should be some hierarchy of markup element types - from general to specific, so that you can markup everything - at least with the most generic element type. -- Johannes Koch In te domine speravi; non confundar in aeternum. (Te Deum, 4th cent.)Received on Thursday, 4 November 2004 11:57:59 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||