Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Re: <NOBR> - Returning to the question....

From: <olafBuddenhagen@web.de>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 12:27:01 +0200
To: www-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <20040331102701.GB4637@sky.local>

Hi,

On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 12:14:54PM -0500, Orion Adrian wrote:

> >If Unicode linebreaking rules are any good (I do not know them), the
> >problem is actually a different one: Nobody but professional
> >typesetters do know and respect the five or so different types of
> >dash-like characters, all fulfilling a different purpose, and all
> >having a different character code in Unicode (I guess).
> >
> >However, once you actually start to consider the fact that -1
> >shouldn't be broken, you'll probably also consider the fact that
> >minus is something different than a dash or a hyphen...
> >
> 
> This I think is an editor issue.

To some extend, yes. But it doesn't really fix the problem.

Note that text processing systems like LaTeX and MS Word do offer quite
a fine distinction of different '-' characters. But hardly anyone uses
them, or would be able to.

Of course one might try to implement some heuristics for *guessing* what
'-' is meant. (Word probably even does so, as it does for other
things...) However, imperfect heuristics (which is a tautology) can be
*very* annoying... Not sure this is a good idea.

With modern technology allowing (even forcing) everyone to be a
publisher, maybe shools should start teaching basic typesetting
knowledge...

-antrik-
Received on Wednesday, 31 March 2004 06:46:52 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.