![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: proposal for change of Flow.model
From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 08:34:24 -0400 Message-Id: <2038D5AA-DF00-11D8-8A46-000A95718F82@w3.org> To: www-html@w3.org Le 25 juil. 2004, à 06:07, Sjoerd Visscher a écrit : > The models for blockcode, blockquote and p would have to change > similarly. I would consider that it would be a lot easier for the authors if there was a distinction between "semantics elements" and "structure elements". The Block/Inline dichotomy doesn't make sense at all for the "semantics elements". Some elements should be authorized, IMHO, in any type of context, either block or inline. * Structureless elements Code: blockcode and code -> code Quotation: blockquote and quote -> quote * Others address, samp, summary, caption, etc. You could wonder why there's no: blockaddress and address or blocksamp and samp. So more than duplicating all semantics elements it would be a lot easier, IMHO, if these elements were not inline or block at all. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***Received on Monday, 26 July 2004 08:34:25 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||