* David Woolley wrote:
>>>(Valid HTML 2 documents (which don't need <!DOCTYPE....) can start with
>>><TITLE>; this can also be the first tag agfter the <!DOCTYPE directive
>>>for HTML 4.01 documents.)
>>
>> I don't know what a "Valid HTML 2 document" is, but documents conforming
>> to RFC 1866 (HTML 2.0) must start with a document type declaration.
>
>Quoting said document:
>
>      NOTE - If the body of a `text/html' message entity does not begin
>      with a document type declaration, an HTML user agent should infer
>      the above document type declaration.
>
>This is what makes documents without a DOCTYPE HTML 2.0.

My point is that if it does not have a document type declaration, it
ain't HTML 2.0 and is thus most likely not "Valid HTML 2.0" as opposed
to your claim.