Niklas Wahlberg wrote:

> I totally agree, thank you!
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin E [mailto:espmartin@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 5:15 PM
> To: www-html@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Admin, filter this guy off!!!
> 
> 
> 
> Sorry, the dsr@w3.org sender - that dork!!!!
> 
> Spammer -     _and_please_do_not_open_his/her_attachments!!!!
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: Martin E 
> To: www-html@w3.org 
> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 2:13 PM
> Subject: Admin, filter this guy off!!!
> 
> 
> Someone (List Admin?) get this dork black listed (off this list!!!!!!!!)
> 

ij@w3.org is weird too.  And I saw a bbos@w3.org come a spammin' thru 
recently, too.  This is not good cuz Bert is a hero of mine, so anyone 
who corrupts Bert's name... is on my hit list. :)

I'm at or over 50% spam from w3.org. This, and the complaints of lost 
posts (I lost 2 from the style maillist last month)... could be looked 
into.  While we're at it, lets look into ALL aspects of the w3c to see 
what unwanted influences are affecting it and its reputation.  And let's 
keep in mind the difference between trolling and healthy scrutiny.

Wing