If you use Mac OS X Mail, you can set up a rule to filter out specific 
senders.

If you use Windows Outlook (not sure about Express), you can set up a 
rule to filter out specific senders.

If you use a different client, you *should* be able to set up a rule 
... but I'm not sure, because I only use these two (Outlook at work and 
Mail at home)

Alternatively, you may consider giving SpamFire a try: I just installed 
it, set to "Merciless" mode (I like that it has a mode named 
"Merciless"), and I'll see how it does. (It was part of Ten for X -- 
Mac OS X, that is -- but it was available for Windows, too).

Kurtis

On Feb 28, 2004, at 3:11 AM, Wingnut wrote:

>
> Niklas Wahlberg wrote:
>
>> I totally agree, thank you!
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Martin E [mailto:espmartin@hotmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 5:15 PM
>> To: www-html@w3.org
>> Subject: Re: Admin, filter this guy off!!!
>> Sorry, the dsr@w3.org sender - that dork!!!!
>> Spammer -     _and_please_do_not_open_his/her_attachments!!!!
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: Martin E To: www-html@w3.org Sent: 
>> Friday, February 27, 2004 2:13 PM
>> Subject: Admin, filter this guy off!!!
>> Someone (List Admin?) get this dork black listed (off this 
>> list!!!!!!!!)
>
> ij@w3.org is weird too.  And I saw a bbos@w3.org come a spammin' thru 
> recently, too.  This is not good cuz Bert is a hero of mine, so anyone 
> who corrupts Bert's name... is on my hit list. :)
>
> I'm at or over 50% spam from w3.org. This, and the complaints of lost 
> posts (I lost 2 from the style maillist last month)... could be looked 
> into.  While we're at it, lets look into ALL aspects of the w3c to see 
> what unwanted influences are affecting it and its reputation.  And 
> let's keep in mind the difference between trolling and healthy 
> scrutiny.
>
> Wing
>
>
>