very useful and valuable suggestion.
however, among all the mailing lists i've every subscribed to, this  
(www-html) is the one that i ever got spam emails from (not to mention  
on a regular basis).
simply unacceptable.

Tony S. Wu
tonyswu@mac.com

"The world doesn't give us hope - it gives us chance."
http://homepage.mac.com/tonyswu/tonyswu     - My web page.
------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
-------



On Feb 28, 2004, at 6:07 PM, Kurtis Kroon wrote:

>
> If you use Mac OS X Mail, you can set up a rule to filter out specific  
> senders.
>
> If you use Windows Outlook (not sure about Express), you can set up a  
> rule to filter out specific senders.
>
> If you use a different client, you *should* be able to set up a rule  
> ... but I'm not sure, because I only use these two (Outlook at work  
> and Mail at home)
>
> Alternatively, you may consider giving SpamFire a try: I just  
> installed it, set to "Merciless" mode (I like that it has a mode named  
> "Merciless"), and I'll see how it does. (It was part of Ten for X --  
> Mac OS X, that is -- but it was available for Windows, too).
>
> Kurtis
>
> On Feb 28, 2004, at 3:11 AM, Wingnut wrote:
>
>>
>> Niklas Wahlberg wrote:
>>
>>> I totally agree, thank you!
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Martin E [mailto:espmartin@hotmail.com]
>>> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 5:15 PM
>>> To: www-html@w3.org
>>> Subject: Re: Admin, filter this guy off!!!
>>> Sorry, the dsr@w3.org sender - that dork!!!!
>>> Spammer -     _and_please_do_not_open_his/her_attachments!!!!
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: Martin E To: www-html@w3.org  
>>> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 2:13 PM
>>> Subject: Admin, filter this guy off!!!
>>> Someone (List Admin?) get this dork black listed (off this  
>>> list!!!!!!!!)
>>
>> ij@w3.org is weird too.  And I saw a bbos@w3.org come a spammin' thru  
>> recently, too.  This is not good cuz Bert is a hero of mine, so  
>> anyone who corrupts Bert's name... is on my hit list. :)
>>
>> I'm at or over 50% spam from w3.org. This, and the complaints of lost  
>> posts (I lost 2 from the style maillist last month)... could be  
>> looked into.  While we're at it, lets look into ALL aspects of the  
>> w3c to see what unwanted influences are affecting it and its  
>> reputation.  And let's keep in mind the difference between trolling  
>> and healthy scrutiny.
>>
>> Wing
>>
>>
>>
>