Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:

> No, "valid XML" means that the document complies with the rules in the
> document type definition; the DTD does not allow a xmlns:html attribute
> on the html element, the document is thus not "valid", not namespace-
> valid and not a strictly conforming XHTML 1.0 document; it is however
> well-formed and namespace-well-formed.

My apologies, that's what I wanted to say. Thanks Björn.

</Daniel>