![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: XHTML attributes and namespace, clarification needed
From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:44:24 +0000 Message-ID: <41BED1FB.3090209@expway.fr> To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> Cc: www-html@w3.org, www-style@w3.org Daniel Glazman wrote: > 3) according to Namespaces in XML section 5.3 [3], the following is ok: > > <x xmlns:n1="http://www.w3.org " > xmlns="http://www.w3.org " > > <good a="1" n1:a="2" /> > </x> Yes, since you have two distinct {}a and {http://www.w3.org}a attributes > So, the following is valid XML too, right ? > > <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml " xml:lang="en" lang="en" > xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml "> > <body> > <p dir="rtl" html:dir="ltr" > class="foo" html:class="bar" > this is a paragraph > </p> > </body> > </html> Yes it is. > a) can someone tell me what is the direction of the paragraph above ? It's 'rtl'. > b) XHTML 1.0 spec section C.13" [5] says "Within the XHTML namespace, user > agents are expected to recognize the "class" attribute". But in > <p class="foo">, [2] states that the class attribute has NO namespace... > So can someone tell me what is the class of the paragraph above ? It's 'foo'. What I believe we have here is a poor choice of words rather than a mistake. The sentence you quote above should read: "Within *elements in* the XHTML namespace, user agents are expected to recognize the 'class' attribute", or something along those lines. Something similar already came up a while back (sorry, member only): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-html-wg/2004JulSep/0111.html > c) if the answer is "it has two classes, one with no namespace and the > other in the XHTML namespace", can someone explain me which one is > used for the class selector in CSS ? And what is the text colour of the > paragraph ? And which attribute editing tools should offer to handle ? Having two classes would be just wrong. > d) shouldn't **all** XHTML attributes declare the XHTML namespace ? I > understand this would be a mess but isn't it what the specs quoted > above seem to imply ? No, that would be terrible. They should simply never be in a namespace. XHTML M12N has some provisions for XHTML attributes to become available to other vocabularies, but it's not automatic. -- Robin BerjonReceived on Tuesday, 14 December 2004 22:37:07 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||