Interesting analysis Björn

Le 03 août 2004, à 15:26, Bjoern Hoehrmann a écrit :
> if the latter is
> what the HTML Working Group considers more important, it would make way
> more sense to require that style sheets are not used to insert the 
> quote
> marks, or to require user agents to support the relevant CSS 2.0
> features.

CSS 2.0 or CSS 2.1?

CSS 2.1 is in CR phase
	http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/CR-CSS21-20040225/ 

You can read their
	s/Candidate Recommendation Exit Criteria/Proposed Recommendation 
Entrance Criteria/
	http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/CR-CSS21-20040225/#crec 


which means to enter the Proposed Recommendation status:
	http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/tr.html#cfr 	
	"""	2. Shown that each feature of the technical
	report has been implemented. Preferably, the Working
	Group SHOULD be able to demonstrate two interoperable
	implementations of each feature. If the Director
	believes that immediate Advisory Committee review is
	critical to the success of a technical report, the
	Director MAY accept to Call for Review of a Proposed
	Recommendation even without adequate implementation
	experience;"""

More information about Implementation Report
	http://esw.w3.org/topic/ImplementationReport 

We might hope that it will be implemented (or dropped :/)



-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ 
W3C Conformance Manager
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***