Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Re: [xhtml2] Questions

From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 23:07:55 +0200
Message-ID: <41290B2B.7050106@annevankesteren.nl>
To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
CC: Jens Meiert <jens.meiert@erde3.com>, W3C HTML <www-html@w3.org>

>> Well, can you please shed some light on some XHTML 2.0 issues
>> (though they're rather questions which concern former HTML
>> versions):
>> 
>> - For non-native English speakers, it's sometimes difficult to
>> understand the difference between <cite /> and <quote />, since
>> citations often seem to be quoted, too (this is a presentational
>> aspect, I know).
>> 
>> I must admit, what exactly is the semantic difference? I always
>> perceived the <quote /> and <blockquote /> elements as a more
>> general approach to represent citations, too.
> 
> This (the examples given) could be *one* of the possibilities, the 
> precise content model is not completely defined; Some will say it's a
> feature, others will say it's a bug. It really depends on what you
> do and what kind of apps you developed, maybe the missing guide for
> XHTML is an official *Best Practices for XHTML*

Such a guide might be nice. Although I think that a tight specification 
should be enough. The above addressed questions should be clear from the 
specification.


> The class values (dc:title, dc:author) are my own and have nothing 
> official. if you want to style that in CSS, you have to do something
> like that:
> 
> .dc\:title { color: black;}

Maybe some RDF attribute should be developed? So elements can be given
more specific semantics without the need for CLASS "hacks" or "ugly
workarounds".


> the value of the cite is a *URI*, so URN are possible if you think
> that in your system it's better. Unfortunately they are not
> implemented as a link in browsers.

Maybe because the specification doesn't define how a browser should
treat the attribute exactly? It doesn't sound really like good design
either to hide information that should be displayed inside an attribute.


> When there is for example an "http-like" URI. You may wish to have a
> contextual menu to go to the source.

Exactly. Or having elements so people can describe the source of quotation.

  <blockquote>
   <p>...</p>
   <p>...</p>
   <source href="http://example.org/ ">...</source>
  </blockquote>

Where SOURCE can have nested inline elements.


-- 
  Anne van Kesteren
  <http://annevankesteren.nl/ >
Received on Sunday, 22 August 2004 21:08:17 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.