Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Re: complexity (was: Re: XHTML and RDF)

From: Orion Adrian <oadrian@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 10:43:58 -0400
To: www-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <BAY1-F10K2v5jckZhlh00006a26@hotmail.com>

> > A specification is a document that describes a process or technology 
>that is
> > sufficiently precise enough that people can use the document to 
>implement
> > the process or technology in such a way that the desired output always 
>flows
> > from a given set of inputs.
>
>Actually, one of the main reasons for a specification is often to clearly
>identify what is left as implementation choices; it is about identifying
>what can be safely assumed, as much as exactly what happens.
>
>CSS is a particularly strong case here, as, whilst many graphic designers
>expect PDF like fidelity, CSS is actually only specified as hinting, and
>that is a positive choice in its specification.

And yet, what I said still doesn't preclude that variability. It only 
specifies that the desired output flows from the desired inputs. I didn't 
speak at all about side effects.

Though as someone who has to design web sites, I would definately like to 
see more precision out of CSS and less inoperable workings.

Orion Adrian

_________________________________________________________________
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar ? get it now! 
http://toolbar.msn.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/ 
Received on Wednesday, 14 April 2004 10:45:01 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.