![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: complexity (was: Re: XHTML and RDF)
From: Orion Adrian <oadrian@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 10:43:58 -0400 To: www-html@w3.org Message-ID: <BAY1-F10K2v5jckZhlh00006a26@hotmail.com> > > A specification is a document that describes a process or technology >that is > > sufficiently precise enough that people can use the document to >implement > > the process or technology in such a way that the desired output always >flows > > from a given set of inputs. > >Actually, one of the main reasons for a specification is often to clearly >identify what is left as implementation choices; it is about identifying >what can be safely assumed, as much as exactly what happens. > >CSS is a particularly strong case here, as, whilst many graphic designers >expect PDF like fidelity, CSS is actually only specified as hinting, and >that is a positive choice in its specification. And yet, what I said still doesn't preclude that variability. It only specifies that the desired output flows from the desired inputs. I didn't speak at all about side effects. Though as someone who has to design web sites, I would definately like to see more precision out of CSS and less inoperable workings. Orion Adrian _________________________________________________________________ FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar ? get it now! http://toolbar.msn.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/Received on Wednesday, 14 April 2004 10:45:01 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||