Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Re: complexity

From: <olafBuddenhagen@web.de>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 23:28:04 +0200
To: www-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <20040419212804.GG1030@sky.local>

Hi,

On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 11:32:32AM -0400, Jewett, Jim J wrote:

> My definition of "small" is one person in his or her spare time.
> 
> That isn't realistic for a new desktop browser -- but there haven't been
> many of those in a while.  (Safari is probably the most recent, and that
> was partly a rebranding of khtml, rather than a completely new browser.)
> 
> For smaller devices, one hobbyist is often exactly what it available, at 
> least as a bootstrap initial version.  For several years, reading on a 
> palm pilot involved shareware or freeware, which didn't have 6 developers.
> 
> Most of these projects never got around to adding CSS support, because
> there wasn't a small-but-obviously-useful chunk to start with; it was
> huge-project or nothing.  Presentational html is supported, because it
> could be done piecemeal.
> 
> And to be perfectly honest, if the standards are really only aimed at
> multiple-full-time-developer projects, then why bother to standardize?
> "What MSIE does", maybe coupled with "what Mozilla and Netscape do" 
> would be just as useful.

Thanks -- you have spoken my mind.
Received on Monday, 19 April 2004 20:05:02 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.