![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: complexity
From: <olafBuddenhagen@web.de>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 23:28:04 +0200 To: www-html@w3.org Message-ID: <20040419212804.GG1030@sky.local> Hi, On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 11:32:32AM -0400, Jewett, Jim J wrote: > My definition of "small" is one person in his or her spare time. > > That isn't realistic for a new desktop browser -- but there haven't been > many of those in a while. (Safari is probably the most recent, and that > was partly a rebranding of khtml, rather than a completely new browser.) > > For smaller devices, one hobbyist is often exactly what it available, at > least as a bootstrap initial version. For several years, reading on a > palm pilot involved shareware or freeware, which didn't have 6 developers. > > Most of these projects never got around to adding CSS support, because > there wasn't a small-but-obviously-useful chunk to start with; it was > huge-project or nothing. Presentational html is supported, because it > could be done piecemeal. > > And to be perfectly honest, if the standards are really only aimed at > multiple-full-time-developer projects, then why bother to standardize? > "What MSIE does", maybe coupled with "what Mozilla and Netscape do" > would be just as useful. Thanks -- you have spoken my mind.Received on Monday, 19 April 2004 20:05:02 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||