Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Re: XHTML 2.0 <datetime> element proposal

From: <zsau@firespeaker.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 07:21:38 -0500 (EST)
To: Lachlan Hunt <lhunt07@postoffice.csu.edu.au>
Cc: www-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.40.0310300716310.25164-100000@firespeaker.org>

On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Lachlan Hunt wrote:

>   A datetime element would be useful because it would designate a piece
> of data as a date and/or time.  Without it, if you encounter a date on a
> webpage that contains a date like 02/04/03, what does that mean?  2
> April 2003? 4 February 2003? 03 April 2003?  It's impossible to tell,
> without looking at the origin of the web page and then figure out "how
> do they write dates in that country?". [1]

The kind of person who would write 02/04/03 isn't going to use a datetime
tag. They're writing 02/04/03 because it takes too long to write 2 April
2003. If they have _any_ concern for usability, they probably are writing
somewhere (e.g. a forum) that strips tags _anyway_, so they won't have the
option.

--
Tristan.
Received on Thursday, 30 October 2003 07:45:13 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.