![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: Cite
From: Lanny Heidbreder <newsgroups@75thtrombone.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 17:43:09 -0600 Message-ID: <004001c3ae2d$b9177730$2d00050a@sft> To: <www-html@w3.org> > 1. It would stop people misusing it to italicize titles where nothing > is cited. Example: > > <p>Lawrence of Arabia carried a copy of the Morte D'Arthur in his > knapsack.<p> > > Here if anything is being cited, it's (implicity) The Seven Pillars > of Wisdom, and <cite> is inappropriate around "Morte D'Arthur". If > browsers don't italicize people won't do this. a) So what ARE we supposed to use to mark up titles? <span class="title">? Ew. b) I don't think your example is an inappropriate use of <cite>. In the context of the story, Morte D'Arthur is being cited in a sense. And just that it isn't accompanied by a quote doesn't mean it's not a citation of another work. In the same way that <dl>s aren't purely for definitions, <cite> doesn't have to adhere to a strict English definition of a citation. Does it? (And I think you're not bending the strict English definition very far at all to use <cite> this way.) -LHReceived on Tuesday, 18 November 2003 18:35:35 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||