![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: <link> vs. <script> for external scripts
From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 21:48:39 +0000 (GMT) Message-Id: <200311202148.hAKLmdK04839@djwhome.demon.co.uk> To: www-html@w3.org > Well since the attribute that specifies the scripting language of the > script should be required, then if that attribute isn't there, it wouldn't > be valid XHTML2, so it wouldn't be rendered, end of story. Browsers are only required to reject not-wellformed documents.Received on Thursday, 20 November 2003 16:52:22 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||