 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: <link> vs. <script> for external scripts
From: Ernest Cline <ernestcline@mindspring.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 10:00:56 -0500 Message-ID: <410-220031142015056765@mindspring.com> To: "Toby A Inkster" <tobyink@goddamn.co.uk> Cc: "W3C HTML List" <www-html@w3.org> > [Original Message] > From: Toby A Inkster <tobyink@goddamn.co.uk> > > I'm not even entirely sure that we need <noscript/>. What about: > > <body onload="document.getElementById('noscript').style.display='none';"> > <h1>Example</h1> > <p id="noscript">This paragraph acts more or less the same as a > <code><noscript/></code> element.</p> > </body> And what if a user has scripting enabled, but styles disabled? Then the "noscript" elements would still be displayed which is not what is desired..Received on Thursday, 20 November 2003 10:00:54 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||
