 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: <link> vs. <script> for external scripts
From: Toby A Inkster <tobyink@goddamn.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 07:46:46 +0000 To: Christian Wolfgang Hujer <Christian.Hujer@itcqis.com> Cc: Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com>, W3C HTML List <www-html@w3.org> Message-ID: <20031120074646.GA15132@ophelia.goddamn.co.uk> On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 05:48:57PM +0100, Christian Wolfgang Hujer wrote: | Oh, this may be it, I can't concentrate enough now, so I ask instead of try it | myself: | Does it mean that if I use <body><noscript></noscript></body>, <noscript/>'s | content model is that of <body/>, and if I use | <body><p><noscript></noscript></p></body>, <noscript/>'s content model is | that of <p/>? I'm not even entirely sure that we need <noscript/>. What about: <body onload="document.getElementById('noscript').style.display='none';"> <h1>Example</h1> <p id="noscript">This paragraph acts more or less the same as a <code><noscript/></code> element.</p> </body> -- Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS Contact Me - http://www.goddamn.co.uk/tobyink/?page=132Received on Thursday, 20 November 2003 02:48:44 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||
