Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Re: Scripting DTD's

From: Wingnut <wingnut@winternet.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 10:58:51 -0600
Message-ID: <3FB509CB.40700@winternet.com>
To: www-html@w3.org

Ernest Cline wrote:

> From: Lachlan Hunt <lhunt07@postoffice.csu.edu.au>
> 
>>AaronEldreth@cs.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>>The DTD would simply tell the browser how to interpret the If...then, 
>>>else, case and other handlers. XML or at least XHTML would be 
>>>stretched from a SGML based language, to a universal programming 
>>>language capable of doing anything.
>>
>>  XHTML is not and should not be a programming language.  XHTML is 
>>called "Extensible HyperText Markup Language", NOT "Extensible HyperText 
>>Multipurpose Language", and, therefore, it is designed for marking up 
>>structure in documents only, and that's how it should stay.  Scripting 
>>XML documents is the domain of the Document Object Model [DOM] and the 
>>scripting language standards, like ECMAScript [ECMA-262].
>>
>>[DOM] http://www.w3.org/DOM/ 
>>[ECMA-262] 
>>http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-262.htm 
> 
> 
> While it would  be possible to write an SGML DTD that would check
> for the validity of some ECMAScript, in either a separate file or
> as part of an (X)HTML file, I'd have to question its utility.  At best
> it would have the ability to check that it's syntactically valid,
> and that is but a small part of what I would want from anything that
> verified a script file.  Besides, using a DTD for that purpose is
>  akin to using a piledriver to crack nuts. It could do it,
> but it probably isn't worth the effort it would take to ensure you
> get shelled nuts and not nut butter.
> 
>  (Given the subset of SGML that XML is, I don't think it's possible
>  to generate an XML DTD that would check for the syntactic
> validity of ECMAScript , but I may be wrong.)
> 

I'm not sure if this is applicable or pertinent, but my css animator 
system (barely in alpha) does something akin to what you guys/gals are 
jawing.  Turn on your javascript and dom2 browsers for this baby.  Read 
the 'info' to see how I used a xml-like markup as a "command language", 
or look to the bottom of the source.  Have I written a dtd for the new 
markup?  No.  Wanna?  Please do. :)  Best wishes.  Wingnut

http://www.winternet.com/~wingnut/html/test/jackal/jackal56.htm 

PS: If you drive konquerer or some of the other Mozilla offshoots, feel 
free to email me direct with seen anomalies. thx.
Received on Friday, 14 November 2003 11:59:16 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.