If you don't question the sense of two or more definitions (and I mean
_definitions_) for one term, I propose an extended usage of the old definition
list like


     <dl>

          <dt>foo</dt>
          <dd>bar 1</dd>
          <dd>bar 2</dd>

          <dt>mickey</dt>
          <dd>mouse</dd>

     </dl>


Regards,
 Jens Meiert.



> 
> 
> 
> Marcos Caceres said:
> > When I think about it some more, doing this kind of nesting may also 
> > require
> > the renaming of the dl, dd, dt, or even adding some sort of container 
> > that
> > wraps around a definition.. Something different like this:
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > <dl>
> > 
> >     <definition>
> > 
> > <dt>My term</dt>
> > 
> >             <dd>This is the a definition</dd>
> > 
> > <dd>This is the another definition</dd>
> > 
> >       </definition>
> > 
> > </dl>
> 
> This sounds a lot better to me
> 


-- 
Jens Meiert

Steubenstr. 28
D-26123 Oldenburg

Telefon +49 (0)441 99 86 147
Telefax +49 (0)89 1488 2325 91
Mobil +49 (0)175 78 4146 5

eMail <jens@meiert.com>
Internet <http://meiert.com >