![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Shorten <object> in XHTML 2.0?
From: J. King <mtknight@dark-phantasy.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 17:38:12 -0400 To: www-html@w3.org Message-ID: <oprrhydyebk4suho@mail.dark-phantasy.com> It's been discussed that markup can easily be either too short or too long. Since <object> is likely to be used quite extensively in XHTML 2.0, it would seem to be preferable to shorten it to something like <obj>, which can still be rather easily decyphered--more easily than some old HTML elements and attributes, even. Given the nature of <object> and its new importance, cutting the extra three character would make inserting images into XHTML 2.0 documents less of a chore than it would otherwise have to be. Though since <object> is already well established, this would make transition a little less obvious, but things are getting seriously jumbled and rearranged anyway--would it not be a reasonable change? -- J. KingReceived on Saturday, 28 June 2003 18:10:17 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||