![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] RE: favicon.ico vs <link> - add link type for shortcut icon?
From: Jens Meiert <jens.meiert@erde3.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 18:35:59 +0200 (MEST) To: Chris Moschini <Chris.Moschini@amdocs.com> Cc: www-html@w3.org, www-style@w3.org Message-ID: <2820.1056990959@www5.gmx.net> > perhaps reference to > "favicon" belongs in a site's CSS instead Why!? Otherwise please be consequent and stop all the object element discussion and simply put all images into your CSS...! I think the 'favicon' topic is very special, and I neither appreciate a extra link element use nor a CSS integration for it, that's both inelegantly for me. Either define a common place and name for it (as exists and often works as 'favicon.ico' in the server root) and leave it from markup, or integrate it e.g. as a <title /> attribute like <title icon="./foo/bar.gif" /> All the best, Jens. > > Well, I think the main reason might be, this link type > only has something to do with graphical browsers; > text-only browsers, or speech browsers - will simply > ignore it... > > Although it's only really useful for graphical browsers, that doesn't mean > it's useless. > > That is interesting you mention CSS however; perhaps reference to > "favicon" belongs in a site's CSS instead. Adding this to the standard would at > least ensure Mozilla and Opera would follow quickly, though IE it appears is > set in stone... . > > If a link tag is used, I agree "shortcut icon" is entirely innappropriate. > It refers specifically to the Windows Desktop, and violates standards > regarding the rel attribute. "icon" is the proper value. I also agree that > Mozilla's acceptance of any image type (not just the .ico format) is > appropriate. > > The question lies in, I suppose: > > Should the standard be one that formally agrees with and expands what's > already there (that is, link rel="icon", any image format), or should it > avoid such an obscure syntax and be added to the most sensible place for it, > CSS, even though it means it will never see light of day on authors' sites > for at least several years to come? > > -Chris "SoopahMan" Moschini > http://hiveminds.info/ > http://soopahman.com/ > > (ignore attachment) -- Jens Meiert Steubenstr. 28 D-26123 Oldenburg Mobil +49 (0)175 78 4146 5 Telefon +49 (0)441 99 86 147 Telefax +49 (0)89 1488 2325 91 Mail <jens@meiert.com> Internet <http://meiert.com >Received on Monday, 30 June 2003 12:36:21 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||