![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: favicon.ico vs <link> - add link type for shortcut icon?
From: Robin Lionheart <w3c-ml@robinlionheart.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 12:27:25 -0400 Message-ID: <01ab01c33cc9$05e4a730$117de518@prolog021503my> To: <www-html@w3.org> Brian Bober wrote: :: This is obviously an old issue, but couldn't we add :: "shortcut icon" or just "icon" and "shorcut" meaning the same thing (and :: working if placed together) into :: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/types.html#type-links ? rel="shortcut icon" defines two relationships, 'shortcut' and 'icon'. A definition of rel="icon" would suffice. rel="shortcut" isn't an appropriate relationship between a document and an icon, since "shortcut" is IE's synonym for "bookmark". Better to leave "shortcut" undefined and ignored.Received on Friday, 27 June 2003 12:24:10 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||