Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Re: xhtml and javascript

From: Brian Bober <netdemonz@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 09:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20030629160307.42896.qmail@web11704.mail.yahoo.com>
To: www-html@w3.org

Hopefully, they meant its finished in terms of user interface and features, but
not in terms of standards-compliance. Perhaps when tasman is finished, IE 6
Win32 will be switched over to it, but besides that the browser won't change.

--- Joris Huizer <joris_huizer@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> --- Tom Gilder <tom@tom.me.uk> wrote:
> > 
> > On Saturday, June 28, 2003, 10:18:11 PM, Ian Hickson
> > wrote:
> > > On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Tom Gilder wrote:
> > > > You could of course use the DOM to generate the
> > checkbox, but you'd
> > > > have to wait for onload to fire, which is a bad
> > thing
> > > 
> > > You shouldn't need to:
> > >
> > >    <div id="hook"></div>
> > >    <script type="application/x-javascript">
> > >      var element =
> > document.createElement('INPUT');
> > >     
> >
> document.getElementById('hook').appendChild(element);
> > >    </script>
> > 
> > That should work, yes, but sadly IE/win is extremely
> > buggy (and I
> > think I had problems with another browser at some
> > point too, but my
> > mind has gone blank) with modifying the DOM before
> > it's all loaded.
> > Often it comes up with "unknown runtime error" or
> > just stops loading
> > the document full stop.
> > 
> > It's *much* safer in my experience to use
> > document.write (when using
> > HTML, anyway). Using DOM to generate a lot of
> > content can also get
> > extraordinarily messy after a while.
> > 
> 
> Bugginess of one browser isn't exactly a good reason
> not to improve ! Remember NN4 was a disaster with CSS
> but CSS 2 was designed anyway :-) The fact IE is used
> by so many people isn't relevant
> 
> The fact IE doesn't support everything of CSS 2, DOM
> (especially DOM 2), any xhtml, ... is more than enough
> reason to say the browser is far from completed but...
> the MS people think differently.
> Let's hope the statement IE is "finished" was a joke ...
> 
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
> http://sbc.yahoo.com 
> 


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com 
Received on Sunday, 29 June 2003 12:03:08 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.