![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: favicon.ico vs <link> - add link type for shortcut icon?
From: Robin Lionheart <w3c-ml@robinlionheart.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 12:21:27 -0400 Message-ID: <02aa01c33d91$599a9100$117de518@prolog021503my> To: <www-html@w3.org> BB> I just wonder why its never been placed in the BB> standards. JH> Well, I think the main reason might be, this link type JH> only has something to do with graphical browsers; JH> text-only browsers, or speech browsers - will simply JH> ignore it... most other link types are usefull for all JH> browsers, except for the stylesheet, and (arguable) JH> Alternate I think a major reason is that HTML 4.0 became a standard in 1997 and Internet Explorer 5 didn't come out with this feature until 1999. Stylesheets aren't only for graphical browsers. CSS2 has many properties for speech browsers, like 'volume', 'pause-before', 'pause-after', 'speech-rate', 'voice-family', 'stress', and 'speak-punctuation'. Teletype browsers could use properties like 'color' or 'text-decoration: underline' and so forth if they were designed to. Lynx uses 'alternate' links. It presents them with other navigation links in a special list at the top of a page.Received on Saturday, 28 June 2003 12:18:09 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||