Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Re: favicon.ico vs <link> - add link type for shortcut icon?

From: Robin Lionheart <w3c-ml@robinlionheart.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 12:21:27 -0400
Message-ID: <02aa01c33d91$599a9100$117de518@prolog021503my>
To: <www-html@w3.org>

BB> I just wonder why its never been placed in the 
BB> standards.

JH> Well, I think the main reason might be, this link type
JH> only has something to do with graphical browsers;
JH> text-only browsers, or speech browsers - will simply
JH> ignore it... most other link types are usefull for all
JH> browsers, except for the stylesheet, and (arguable)
JH> Alternate 

I think a major reason is that HTML 4.0 became a 
standard in 1997 and Internet Explorer 5 didn't come
out with this feature until 1999.

Stylesheets aren't only for graphical browsers. CSS2
has many properties for speech browsers, like
'volume', 'pause-before', 'pause-after', 'speech-rate',
'voice-family', 'stress', and 'speak-punctuation'. 
Teletype browsers could use properties like 'color'
or 'text-decoration: underline' and so forth if they 
were designed to.

Lynx uses 'alternate' links. It presents them with other
navigation links in a special list at the top of a page.
Received on Saturday, 28 June 2003 12:18:09 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.