Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

favicon.ico vs <link> - add link type for shortcut icon?

From: Brian Bober <netdemonz@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 09:05:33 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20030627160533.92971.qmail@web11701.mail.yahoo.com>
To: www-html@w3.org

Mozilla supports doing favicons via the <link rel="shortcut icon"> or <link
rel="icon"> method, and used to do an aggressive search for favicon.ico, but
that was turned off. IE does the aggressive search whenever you bookmark the
site, but also supports (as far as I know) the link method. That means whenever
you bookmark a site in IE, you get erroneous log entries if you don't have
favicon.ico

A browser shouldn't be searching for a file unless its requested via the html
document. This is obviously an old issue, but couldn't we add "shortcut icon"
or just "icon" and "shorcut" meaning the same thing (and working if placed
together) into http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/types.html#type-links ?

If you don't want that and other extensions to be part of the actual spec,
could you have a clause mentioning other common de-facto link types?

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com 
Received on Friday, 27 June 2003 12:05:34 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.