Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

RE: [#293] Summary for tables

From: Jens Meiert <jens.meiert@erde3.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 15:07:58 +0200 (MEST)
To: www-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <7244.1059397678@www5.gmx.net>

> I'm sorry if I seem arrogant; it's not my intention, and
> I can tell you that I'm not. I see and understand your
> problems, but I don't agree with your solutions.

Okay. By the way, my table post was no solution, but a simple suggestion.

> Yes, layout tables were necessary some years ago, when
> most UA's still had v4.0 stamped on them. But today, it
> isn't, and it's a better solution to get to authors write
> semantically correct HTML than to make a hack in the HTML
> spec to get semantically wrong HTML to "work".

Exactly. What I wanted to express with 'develop for almost all user-agents'
is the need still to develop for version 4.x browsers (since several 100,000s
are still in use) -- and for me, that's a real accessibility matter (which
the entire table discussion was at least about). Maybe this is a decision for
each Web developer, but I decided not to throw out old browsers, not yet;
I'll feel 'guilty' if I'd do so.

Maybe the W3C (or the WAI WG) should publish timelines when to pass on
compatibility to older user-agents...!? Otherwise, there'll always be the problem
to define the moment when to do so (for me that's an important problem since
there'll be only more user-agents, not less).

> > But if you're only that pseudo-expert having no practice
> > at all, testing your markup only in IE 6, you won't
> > understand.
> 
> What makes you get that impression of me?

Now I'm sorry, but I felt somewhat angry when titled as someone 'without
knowledge or experience'. I built a huge amount of Web sites until now, and I
always tried to unite validity, usability, accessibility matters in them -- and
I guess (or hope), successfully anyhow.

> > I don't need any specification advocate when this ain't
> > serving former or current needs. 
> 
> Current needs are based on bad code, and instead of making
> the bad code work, I think we (as a web authoring community)
> should make the bad code right.

I fully agree.


Regards,
 Jens.


-- 
Jens Meiert

Steubenstr. 28
D-26123 Oldenburg

Mobil +49 (0)175 78 4146 5
Telefon +49 (0)441 99 86 147
Telefax +49 (0)89 1488 2325 91

Mail <jens@meiert.com>
Internet <http://meiert.com >
Received on Monday, 28 July 2003 09:08:07 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.