![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: Shorten <object> in XHTML 2.0?
From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 13:43:27 +0300 To: www-html@w3.org Message-Id: <AB835F32-B455-11D7-B77B-003065B8CF0E@iki.fi> On Monday, Jun 30, 2003, at 20:27 Europe/Helsinki, Brian Bober wrote: > First off, let me say that I am not well versed in XML, but I thought > XML was > extensible. In order to avoid confusion, I suggest regarding the 'X' in "XML" and "XHTML" just as a cool letter (as in "X11", "Mac OS X" and "Windows XP") and regarding "extensible" as a positive buzzword that can be abbreviated as 'X' rather that taking the extensibility too literally. > Can't people create their own <obj /> element in their page that > would be an <object /> element? If so, then they can rename it at > their own > descretion. With XML, you can invent element names as you go, but you shouldn't expect programs written by others to do anything useful with your homegrown elements without prior agreement. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://www.iki.fi/hsivonen/Received on Saturday, 12 July 2003 06:43:41 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||