![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] RE: Language negotiation.
From: Rowland Shaw <Rowland.Shaw@crystaldecisions.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 01:49:15 -0700 Message-ID: <963A03BCAFF059488BAFF33AE5C8709701517A2A@ipsent04.crystald.net> To: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk> Cc: www-html@w3.org > David Woolley wrote: > The only sites I know of that do do server side negotiation of anything > but User Agent (using procedural, rather than declarative code, in that > case) are Google, some versions of Microsoft's Windows Update page and > some images on the W3C site. None of these can effectively use > q factors as the common browsers do not allow the users to configure > them, relying on positional fallback instead. I've noticed that the browsers do specify q factors, although not the magnitude, to pick three browsers at random: IE/6: en-gb,xx;q=0.9,fr-ca;q=0.7,en;q=0.6,de-at;q=0.4,ja;q=0.3,zh;q=0.1 NS/7.1: en-gb,xx;q=0.8,fr-ca;q=0.6,de;q=0.4,ja;q=0.2 Opera/7.11: en-gb;q=1.0,en;q=0.9,fr;q=0.8 I have noticed that the algorithm in Apache's mod_negotiation is different to what I'd expect though (I.e. if you ask for "en-gb" then "fr"; it will give you "fr" as typically only "en" is set up - it doesn't implicitly prefer "en" over "fr". Regardless, this is a little off topic for this list ;)Received on Friday, 11 July 2003 04:49:19 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||