![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft
From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 14:07:46 -0000 To: www-html@w3.org Message-ID: <brhqs7$9ls$1@sea.gmane.org> Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org "John Colby" <John.Colby@uce.ac.uk> wrote in message news:107DE25EC0216C45AEF670016024245F01642F5A@e...... >So the pragmatic approach would be to use <acronym> for both acronyms >and abbreviations for all documents, although it is not semantically >correct, and then when it is practicable to change the !DOCTYPE >declaration for XHTML 2.0 do a global search and replace for <acronym> >to <abbr>. IE is not an XHTML user agent, it makes no claims to support XHTML, comverting from HTML 4.01 (that IE does understand) to XHTML 2.0 will not be a job of changing doctypes, the differences between XHTML 2.0 and HTML 4 (or more relevantly tag/soup) I see as irrelevant for recommendations, seperate recommendations should exist for both languages, they are very different. Jim.Received on Sunday, 14 December 2003 09:08:11 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||