Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 21:30:25 +1100
Cc: "Brian Kelly" <B.Kelly@ukoln.ac.uk>, "David Woolley" <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>, <www-html@w3.org>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
To: "John Colby" <John.Colby@uce.ac.uk>
Message-Id: <32863E11-2C8E-11D8-9344-000A958826AA@sidar.org>

It doesn't really make a difference. IE is barely capable of treating 
XHTML 1 properly - you need to do all sorts of nasty compatibility 
stuff (it's legal XML but it isn't particularly nice) to get around its 
non-standard ways of handling Web content. XHTML 2 is not 
backwards-compatible with old browsers anyway, so IE will presumably 
treat it as it does "real" XML (i.e. non-HTML), in which case there is 
no particular value in the parts of the HTML spec that they did 
implement.

Cheers

Chaals

Le Friday, 12 Dec 2003, à 21:21 Australia/Melbourne, John Colby a écrit 
:

> Despite all the semantics it really does make a difference to this
> argument that IE does not recognise and treat correctly <abbr> but does
> recognise and treat correctly <acronym>. The mouseover will display a
> tooltip. It also makes a difference that <acronym> has been dropped 
> from
> the proposals for XHTML 2.0. Other browsers treat each correctly.
>
--
Charles McCathieNevile                          Fundación Sidar
charles@s...                                http://www.sidar.org 
Received on Friday, 12 December 2003 05:32:59 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.