![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft
From: John Colby <John.Colby@uce.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 10:21:50 -0000 Message-ID: <107DE25EC0216C45AEF670016024245F01642F5A@exchangea.staff.uce.ac.uk> To: "Brian Kelly" <B.Kelly@ukoln.ac.uk>, "David Woolley" <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>, <www-html@w3.org>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Despite all the semantics it really does make a difference to this argument that IE does not recognise and treat correctly <abbr> but does recognise and treat correctly <acronym>. The mouseover will display a tooltip. It also makes a difference that <acronym> has been dropped from the proposals for XHTML 2.0. Other browsers treat each correctly. So the pragmatic approach would be to use <acronym> for both acronyms and abbreviations for all documents, although it is not semantically correct, and then when it is practicable to change the !DOCTYPE declaration for XHTML 2.0 do a global search and replace for <acronym> to <abbr>. John John Colby Lecturer, School of Computing, Faculty of Computing, Information and English Room F328a, Feeney Building, University of Central England, Franchise Street, Perry Barr, Birmingham B42 2SU Tel: +44 (0) 121 331 6937, Fax +44 (0) 121 331 6281, Mobile: 0771 114 1621Received on Friday, 12 December 2003 05:23:13 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||