Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft

From: John Colby <John.Colby@uce.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 10:21:50 -0000
Message-ID: <107DE25EC0216C45AEF670016024245F01642F5A@exchangea.staff.uce.ac.uk>
To: "Brian Kelly" <B.Kelly@ukoln.ac.uk>, "David Woolley" <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>, <www-html@w3.org>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

Despite all the semantics it really does make a difference to this
argument that IE does not recognise and treat correctly <abbr> but does
recognise and treat correctly <acronym>. The mouseover will display a
tooltip. It also makes a difference that <acronym> has been dropped from
the proposals for XHTML 2.0. Other browsers treat each correctly.

So the pragmatic approach would be to use <acronym> for both acronyms
and abbreviations for all documents, although it is not semantically
correct, and then when it is practicable to change the !DOCTYPE
declaration for XHTML 2.0 do a global search and replace for <acronym>
to <abbr>.

John

John Colby
Lecturer, School of Computing, Faculty of Computing, Information and
English
Room F328a, Feeney Building, University of Central England,
Franchise Street, Perry Barr, Birmingham B42 2SU
Tel: +44 (0) 121 331 6937, Fax +44 (0) 121 331 6281, Mobile: 0771 114
1621
Received on Friday, 12 December 2003 05:23:13 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.