Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Re: Structure vs Semantics

From: <olafBuddenhagen@web.de>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 17:38:55 +0100
To: www-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <20031214163855.GA482@sky.local>

Hi,

On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 05:55:48PM +0200, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:

> > A typical contract (including many software licenses) will contain
> > several paragraphs of upper-case, because the law says that
> > something needs to be emphasized.
> 
> I don't think it's the law but lawyers that say it needs to be
> "emphasized".

That's irrelevant. The point is that the paragraph is to be emphasized,
*semantically*.

> > Emphasizing with an <em> is better than just upper-casing, for the
> > same reasons that <strong> is better than <b>.
> 
> I think this is an _opposite_ example. Using just CSS to create
> uppercasing is better, since the real intent is not emphasis but
> filling some (imaginary) formal requirement. Everyone knows such text
> don't get emphasis and aren't normally read at all.

That's your personal feeling about this, but not a fact.

Anyways, there is no doubt that whole paragraphs sometimes are to be
emphasized; if you do not like this example, find another one.

-Olaf-
Received on Monday, 15 December 2003 01:39:40 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.