Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft

From: Brian Kelly <B.Kelly@ukoln.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:17:20 -0000
To: jon@hackcraft.net
Cc: 'Charles McCathieNevile' <charles@sidar.org>, 'Christian Wolfgang Hujer' <Christian.Hujer@itcqis.com>, 'David Woolley' <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>, www-html@w3.org, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Message-ID: <010601c3c0d3$cd0dc510$d513268a@ukoln.ac.uk>


> 
> > I wonder whether there may be circumstances in which a 
> rigourous exact 
> > definition may be important - perhaps in legal documents; 
> scientific 
> > pages, etc?
> 
> Yes, I'd buy that. I'd also accept the possibility of the 
> inverse case, where 
> many of the different (whether subtly or strikingly so) 
> definitions, nuances, 
> etymological references and so on could be identified (say 
> for an in-depth 
> analysis of a poem or another piece of literature).
> 
> I'd see both of these as being specialist applications 
> though, providing the 
> framework (perhaps through RDF or similar) may be a suitable 
> task for an 
> application not tasked with providing for that specific 
> speciality, but 
> providing the full capability in a language like HTML seems a 
> bit much.

That's a perfectly reasonable suggestion.

I guess the options are:

Abbreviations (and maybe alt tags for images) are metadata.  There will
be added layers of complexity from what appears on the surface.
Therefore a simple document markup language should leave such issues to
a richer and more appropriate language, such as RDF  (and to take on
board Ernest Cline's message sent a few second's ago, if abbreviations
aren't regarded as metadata they can be regarded as presentational and
should therefore not be including in XHTML 2.0 - but for a different
reason).

Abbreviations (and certainly alt tags for images) may be metadata but
they are also capable of being easily understood and deployed.  It would
be desirable to include a lightweight way of provides support for such
features in a new document markup language, as has been done with HTML.

Comments?

Brian
 
---------------------------------------
Brian Kelly
UK Web Focus
UKOLN
University of Bath 
BATH
BA2 7AY
Email: B.Kelly@ukoln.ac.uk
Web: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/ 
Phone: 01225 383943
FOAF: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/ukoln/staff/b.kelly/foaf/bkelly-foaf.xrdf 
For info on FOAF see http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/ukoln/staff/b.kelly/foaf/ 

> --
> Jon Hanna                   | Toys and books
> <http://www.hackcraft.net/ > | for hospitals:
>                             | <http://santa.boards.ie >
> 
Received on Friday, 12 December 2003 12:20:18 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.