Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Re: more xhtml 2.0 comments

From: <Donna.Worby@dardni.gov.uk>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 09:23:32 +0100
Message-Id: <H000294b016add65.1050654210.petit.dani.gov.uk@MHS>
To: ernestcline@mindspring.com
Cc: www-html@w3.org

Ernest Cline <ernestcline@mindspring.com>:
> I strongly doubt that an 'Mc' character will ever be part of Unicode. 
 
> [...]

Agreed; aside from anything, 'Mc' is counted as two characters in a 
name rather than one.

> As for the suggestion of including <super>c, I also doubt that 
Unicode 
> will include it as Mc, M<sup>c</sup>, and M<sup><u>c</u></sup> are 
all 
> variations I've seen of how to present Mc. 

Applying the correct formatting to the character is not the problem - 
this markup would only make sense to a visual UA. The superscripted 'c' 
in this instance has properties as a character, such as the lexical 
ordering mentioned earlier. I do believe that this 'c' ought to be 
included in Unicode.

> Might I suggest using this:
>   <abbr title="Mac">Mc</abbr>
> since 'Mc' will probably never appear in Unicode unless someone can 
> provide a more impressive reason than what has neen presented here.

For an aural UA, perhaps, but unless an appropriate stylesheet was 
provided this wouldn't render correctly on a visual device.


donna
e.


donna
Received on Friday, 18 April 2003 05:08:44 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.