![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: l element (was: more xhtml 2.0 comments)
From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 07:32:29 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <200304160632.h3G6WTL07879@djwhome.demon.co.uk> To: www-html@w3.org > If I am correct in thinking that the <l>...</l> element has the same > behavior as <div>...</div>, why not remove BOTH from the specification and That's a presentational argument. XHTML2 features have to be justified on primarily structural grounds. > use <container>...</container> (or some other appropriate word/abbreviation) I believe the intention is that <l> should not contain any block level elements, whereas <div> normally only contains block level elements.Received on Wednesday, 16 April 2003 02:32:27 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||