Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Re: l element (was: more xhtml 2.0 comments)

From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 07:32:29 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <200304160632.h3G6WTL07879@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
To: www-html@w3.org

> If I am correct in thinking that the <l>...</l> element has the same
> behavior as <div>...</div>, why not remove BOTH from the specification and

That's a presentational argument.  XHTML2 features have to be justified
on primarily structural grounds.

> use <container>...</container> (or some other appropriate word/abbreviation)

I believe the intention is that <l> should not contain any block level
elements, whereas <div> normally only contains block level elements.
Received on Wednesday, 16 April 2003 02:32:27 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.