![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] l element (was: more xhtml 2.0 comments)
From: Daniel Glazman <glazman@netscape.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 20:11:02 +0200 Message-ID: <3E9C4B36.3080101@netscape.com> To: "www-html@w3.org" <www-html@w3.org> After a quite long IRC chat with fantasai and Ian Hickson, I finally see some interest in the l element. Well, not really, since I still think ol/li and div are enough, but I can live with it :-) I think the WD introduced a very big confusion speaking of lines: the l element represents, I quote the WD, "a single line of text". Some people read this line as "line of poetry" or "line of program", some others read it as "visual line". So a line (l element) is not a line (of poetry) is not a line (well, a line). I strongly recommend (a) a clarification of the definition of the l element (b) another name, this one being too confusing with 1 and i, and intrinsicly too confusing because a "line" has multiple meanings in English having different visual rendering (and that's not the case in other languages). This element meant to serve as a replacement for <br/>, I still think it will too drastically complexify wysiwyg editors. I still totally disagree with the removal of <br/>. comment crossposted to www-html-editor and Karl Dubost FHI. </Daniel>Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2003 14:10:41 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||