![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date] Re: more xhtml 2.0 comments
From: Daniel Glazman <glazman@netscape.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 16:21:22 +0200 Message-ID: <3E9C1562.8000206@netscape.com> To: William F Hammond <hammond@csc.albany.edu> CC: W3C HTML Specification Discussion <www-html@w3.org> William F Hammond wrote: >>>(a) the l element is purely presentational: it _is_ a line. It's not less >>> presentational than <br/>. >>> >>> >><address> >> <l>name</l> >> <l>street</l> >> <l>city</l> >> <l>zip</l> >> <l>country</> >></address> >> >> > >Yes, good example. > Well, from a semantic point of view, and it seems to me that's one of the goals of XHTML 2.0, that's more a disaster than a good example! </Daniel>Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2003 10:20:52 GMT |
|
||||||||||||||||