Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Re: more xhtml 2.0 comments

From: Daniel Glazman <glazman@netscape.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 16:21:22 +0200
Message-ID: <3E9C1562.8000206@netscape.com>
To: William F Hammond <hammond@csc.albany.edu>
CC: W3C HTML Specification Discussion <www-html@w3.org>

William F Hammond wrote:

>>>(a) the l element is purely presentational: it _is_ a line. It's not less
>>>     presentational than <br/>.
>>>      
>>>
>><address>
>>    <l>name</l>
>>    <l>street</l>
>>    <l>city</l>
>>    <l>zip</l>
>>    <l>country</>
>></address>
>>    
>>
>
>Yes, good example.
>


Well, from a semantic point of view, and it seems to me that's one of 
the goals of XHTML 2.0, that's more a disaster than a good example!

</Daniel>
Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2003 10:20:52 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.